Vaquita – Last Chance for the Desert Porpoise

CONSERVATION

How are conservation experts finding a solution to save the vaquita porpoise from extinction?

CONSERVATION

From the first description of the species in 1958, more than 34 years passed before action directed toward vaquita conservation finally occurred in 1992.

Earlier, several management actions indirectly benefited vaquita and/or its environment (reviewed in Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca [SEMARNAP] 1995).

On 2 March 1992, the government created the Technical Committee for the Preservation of the Vaquita and the Totoaba.
This group recommended provisions for protecting vaquita, including the creation of a reserve for the species. On 10 June 1993, the Biosphere Reserve of the Upper Gulf of California and Delta of the Colorado River was declared (Secretaría de Pesca 1994), and in 1995 the management plan for this reserve was published (SEMARNAP 1995).

In 1994, the formal acknowledgment that the vaquita is a species in danger of extinction represented a fundamental change in the policy of the Mexican government toward vaquita. SEMARNAP listed the vaquita on its priority list of species subject to
special protection and conservation (Conservación y Recuperación de Especies Prioritarias; Programa de Conservación de Vida Silvestre y Diversifi cación Productiva en el Sector Rural, 1996–2000; Dirección General de Vida Silvestre, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, 1997).

In 1997 the Mexican Government, through its National Institute of Fisheries, created the International Committee for the Recovery of Vaquita (Comite Internacional para la Recuperacion de la Vaquita [CIRVA]) with scientists
from Europe, North America, and Mexico. The goal of this team was to draft a recovery program based on the best available scientific information.

In its first meeting the recovery team concluded, after reviewing and analyzing potential risk factors, that incidental mortality in gillnets represented the greatest immediate threat to the survival of the species (Rojas-Bracho and Jaramillo-Legoretta 2002).

Later, in its second meeting CIRVA recommended the following:

  • The bycatch of vaquitas must be reduced to zero as soon as possible.
  • The southern boundary of the Biosphere Reserve should be expanded to include all known habitat of the vaquita.
  • Effective enforcement and development of effective enforcement techniques to regulate fisheries activities should be implemented as soon as possible.
  • Research should start immediately to develop alternative gear types and fishing techniques to replace gillnets and development of socioeconomic alternatives for fishermen.
  • On 29 December 2005 the “Program for the Protection of the Vaquita” was published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación, the Mexican Federal Register. The main components of the program were the declaration of a Vaquita Refuge Zone and the transfer of $1 million to the state governments of Baja California and Sonora to implement actions within the
    Vaquita Refuge Zone.

    However, the measures failed due to a lack of specific terms of reference regarding a compensation scheme (see Rojas-Bracho et al. 2006).

    In 2007, the president of Mexico announced the Conservation Program for Endangered Species (Programa de Conservación de Especies en Riesgo), which initiated specific Species Conservation Action Programs (Programas de Acción para la Conservación de Especies) for a list of selected species, including vaquita within the top five.

    Despite all these well-intentioned government declarations, little was done in practice to protect the
    vaquita until 2008). [LINK TO VAQUITA RECOVERY PLAN]

    After the Biosphere Reserve’s management plan was published, no decisive actions were taken to regulate fisheries bycatch within the reserve areas where vaquitas are most commonly found. Furthermore, about 40 percent of vaquitas occur outside the boundaries of the Biosphere Reserve. The Program for the Protection of the Vaquita established the Vaquita Refuge Zone in 2005 that included most of the vaquita habitat, but fishing in that zone continued through 2007 with little change. In fact, the number of pangas fishing with gillnets roughly doubled after CIRVA recommended that the number of pangas be capped
    and that vaquita bycatch should be reduced to zero as soon as possible. The implementation of a real
    vaquita refuge failed because of a lack of enforcement and a lack of an adequate compensation plan or economic alternatives for the artisanal fishermen who depend on that area for their livelihoods.

    Source, excerpt from:

      Barlow, J., L. Rojas-Bracho, C. Muñoz-Piña, and S. Mesnick. 2010. Conservation of the vaquita (Phocoena sinus) in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico. Chapter 15 in: R. Q. Grafton, R. Hilborn, D. Squires, M. Tait, and M. Williams (eds.) Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management. Oxford University Press, New York. 770pp.

    LATEST COMMENTS

    13 Sep 2011 by Some guy

    i really think that something needs to be done, but by the sounds of things, it isnt, come on mexican government!!

    12 Oct 2011 by Rachel

    I think the government would give more, but the economic climate means they have little money to compensate fishermen. It would be good if one of these so called amazing charities, such as WWF would actually put their money where their mouth is an help out!

    19 Nov 2011 by Zac

    I’m doing a project on it.

    LEAVE A COMMENT

    The website content and comments presented on Vaquita.tv are not necessarily reflective of the views of the partnering organizations. While we encourage open debate and conversation, we reserve the right to edit or delete any postings or comments that may be abusive or libelous.

    SCIENCE NEWS

    CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENTS

    LATEST FROM THE COMMUNITIES